In many organizations there tends to be a lot of moving parts in many areas of the company. One such moving part which doesn’t seem to garner that much attention internally is when companies make changes to their privacy policy to better reflect their strategy as it relates to tracking and targeting. When changes are made, there usually isn’t much fanfare and most of the time customers or subscribers are never informed.
Given the time that we live in and the sensitivity around people’s privacy and permission practices of organizations, it might be time for companies to buck up and inform their base of changes. This is especially important if you are making a substantive change to the last accepted policy such as the sharing of information with third parties.
For companies that chose to inform their subscriber base, they are faced with multiple options in how to communicate it:
Some people would look at the above list and chose one, but I am of opinion to chose them all. I believe that in the area of privacy and permission over communication is not as bad as under communication. People want the answers and those folks that consume information through multiple channels would appreciate the level that you went through to let them know of changes. Imagine being on the backside of under communication and having to back peddle in social media and the press…..to me, its not just worth it.
The key takeaway here is that if you plan to make changes to your privacy policy, also have a plan on how you intend to communicate it. Companies often under estimate how seemingly small changes can have a dramatic effect on their customer or subscriber sentiment. I think in todays sensitive climate, I would rather be accused of over rather than under communicating in a situation like this.
Ready to send better messages?
Sign up for our news, resources and updates. The inbox is our favorite place after all. We’ll make sure it’s worth it. (You can unsubscribe at any time, but you probably already knew that.)